Review Article

Hip Pelvis 2013; 25(1): 14-20

Published online March 1, 2013

https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2013.25.1.14

© The Korean Hip Society

Cementless Implant in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Taek-Rim Yoon, MD, Kyung-Soon Park, MD, Hong-An Lim, MD

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Jeonnam, Korea

Correspondence to : Taek-Rim Yoon, MD
Center for Joint Disease, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, 322 Seoyong-ro, Hwasun-eup, Hwasun-gun, Jeonnam 519-809, Korea
TEL: +82-61-379-7677 FAX: +82-61-379-7681
E-mail: tryoon@chonnam.ac.kr

Received: August 7, 2012; Revised: March 5, 2013; Accepted: March 12, 2013

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The various implants used in total hip arthroplasty can be classified according to the design and the fixation type. In general, they can be divided into two groups; cemented and cementless types. The surgeon’s decision regarding which type of implant to use should be based on the goal of the arthroplasty operation, the bony deformity of the patient, the function of the involved hip joint, and the experience of the operator. When using cementless implants, primary fixation, survival rate, and successful fixation on long-term follow-up depend on the material of the implant, the bone quality, and, ultimately, the interaction between the implant and the bone. Cementless implants have shown a high success rate in primary total hip arthroplasty and relatively fine outcomes on long-term follow-up. In comparison of the two implant types, superiority has yet to be determined, however, a choice made based on the objective of the surgery, the function of the joint, the quality of the bone, and the surgeon's experience will result in a good outcome. Therefore, we reviewed the qualities of cementless implants, the application, and the various procedures involving the implant.

Keywords Total hip arthroplasty, Cemented implant, Cementless implant

Article

Review Article

Hip Pelvis 2013; 25(1): 14-20

Published online March 1, 2013 https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2013.25.1.14

Copyright © The Korean Hip Society.

Cementless Implant in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Taek-Rim Yoon, MD, Kyung-Soon Park, MD, Hong-An Lim, MD

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Jeonnam, Korea

Correspondence to:Taek-Rim Yoon, MD
Center for Joint Disease, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, 322 Seoyong-ro, Hwasun-eup, Hwasun-gun, Jeonnam 519-809, Korea
TEL: +82-61-379-7677 FAX: +82-61-379-7681
E-mail: tryoon@chonnam.ac.kr

Received: August 7, 2012; Revised: March 5, 2013; Accepted: March 12, 2013

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The various implants used in total hip arthroplasty can be classified according to the design and the fixation type. In general, they can be divided into two groups; cemented and cementless types. The surgeon’s decision regarding which type of implant to use should be based on the goal of the arthroplasty operation, the bony deformity of the patient, the function of the involved hip joint, and the experience of the operator. When using cementless implants, primary fixation, survival rate, and successful fixation on long-term follow-up depend on the material of the implant, the bone quality, and, ultimately, the interaction between the implant and the bone. Cementless implants have shown a high success rate in primary total hip arthroplasty and relatively fine outcomes on long-term follow-up. In comparison of the two implant types, superiority has yet to be determined, however, a choice made based on the objective of the surgery, the function of the joint, the quality of the bone, and the surgeon's experience will result in a good outcome. Therefore, we reviewed the qualities of cementless implants, the application, and the various procedures involving the implant.

Keywords: Total hip arthroplasty, Cemented implant, Cementless implant

H&P
Vol.36 No.1 Mar 01, 2024, pp. 1~75

Stats or Metrics

Share this article on

  • line

Related articles in H&P

Hip & Pelvis